Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.

7 MySQL Optimization

Optimization is a complex task because ultimately it requires understanding of the entire system to be optimized. Although it may be possible to perform some local optimizations with little knowledge of your system or application, the more optimal you want your system to become, the more you will have to know about it.

This chapter tries to explain and give some examples of different ways to optimize MySQL. Remember, however, that there are always additional ways to make the system even faster, although they may require increasing effort to achieve.

7.1 Optimization Overview

The most important factor in making a system fast is its basic design. You also need to know what kinds of things your system will be doing, and what your bottlenecks are.

The most common system bottlenecks are:

7.1.1 MySQL Design Limitations and Tradeoffs

When using the MyISAM storage engine, MySQL uses extremely fast table locking that allows multiple readers or a single writer. The biggest problem with this storage engine occurs when you have a steady stream of mixed updates and slow selects on a single table. If this is a problem for certain tables, you can use another table type for them. See section 15 MySQL Storage Engines and Table Types.

MySQL can work with both transactional and non-transactional tables. To be able to work smoothly with non-transactional tables (which can't roll back if something goes wrong), MySQL has the following rules (when not running in STRICT mode or if you use the IGNORE specifier to INSERT or UPDATE).

If you are using non-transactional tables, you should not use MySQL to check column content. In general, the safest (and often fastest) way is to let the application ensure that it passes only legal values to the database.

For more information about this, see section 1.8.6 How MySQL Deals with Constraints and section 14.1.4 INSERT Syntax or section 5.2.2 The Server SQL Mode.

7.1.2 Designing Applications for Portability

Because all SQL servers implement different parts of standard SQL, it takes work to write portable SQL applications. It is very easy to achieve portability for very simple selects and inserts, but becomes more difficult the more capabilities you require. If you want an application that is fast with many database systems, it becomes even harder!

To make a complex application portable, you need to determine which SQL servers it must work with, then determine what features those servers support.

All database systems have some weak points. That is, they have different design compromises that lead to different behavior.

You can use the MySQL crash-me program to find functions, types, and limits that you can use with a selection of database servers. crash-me does not check for every possible feature, but it is still reasonably comprehensive, performing about 450 tests.

An example of the type of information crash-me can provide is that you shouldn't have column names longer than 18 characters if you want to be able to use Informix or DB2.

The crash-me program and the MySQL benchmarks are all very database independent. By taking a look at how they are written, you can get a feeling for what you have to do to make your own applications database independent. The programs can be found in the `sql-bench' directory of MySQL source distributions. They are written in Perl and use the DBI database interface. Use of DBI in itself solves part of the portability problem because it provides database-independent access methods.

For crash-me results, visit http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/crash-me.php. See http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/benchmarks/ for the results from the benchmarks.

If you strive for database independence, you need to get a good feeling for each SQL server's bottlenecks. For example, MySQL is very fast in retrieving and updating records for MyISAM tables, but will have a problem in mixing slow readers and writers on the same table. Oracle, on the other hand, has a big problem when you try to access rows that you have recently updated (until they are flushed to disk). Transactional databases in general are not very good at generating summary tables from log tables, because in this case row locking is almost useless.

To make your application really database independent, you need to define an easily extendable interface through which you manipulate your data. As C++ is available on most systems, it makes sense to use a C++ class-based interface to the databases.

If you use some feature that is specific to a given database system (such as the REPLACE statement, which is specific to MySQL), you should implement the same feature for other SQL servers by coding an alternative method. Although the alternative may be slower, it will allow the other servers to perform the same tasks.

With MySQL, you can use the /*! */ syntax to add MySQL-specific keywords to a query. The code inside /**/ will be treated as a comment (and ignored) by most other SQL servers.

If high performance is more important than exactness, as in some Web applications, it is possible to create an application layer that caches all results to give you even higher performance. By letting old results ``expire'' after a while, you can keep the cache reasonably fresh. This provides a method to handle high load spikes, in which case you can dynamically increase the cache and set the expiration timeout higher until things get back to normal.

In this case, the table creation information should contain information of the initial size of the cache and how often the table should normally be refreshed.

An alternative to implementing an application cache is to use the MySQL query cache. By enabling the query cache, the server handles the details of determining whether a query result can be reused. This simplifies your application. See section 5.11 The MySQL Query Cache.

7.1.3 What We Have Used MySQL For

This section describes an early application for MySQL.

During MySQL initial development, the features of MySQL were made to fit our largest customer, which handled data warehousing for a couple of the largest retailers in Sweden.

From all stores, we got weekly summaries of all bonus card transactions, and were expected to provide useful information for the store owners to help them find how their advertising campaigns were affecting their own customers.

The volume of data was quite huge (about seven million summary transactions per month), and we had data for 4-10 years that we needed to present to the users. We got weekly requests from our customers, who wanted to get ``instant'' access to new reports from this data.

We solved this problem by storing all information per month in compressed ``transaction'' tables. We had a set of simple macros that generated summary tables grouped by different criteria (product group, customer id, store, and so on) from the tables in which the transactions were stored. The reports were Web pages that were dynamically generated by a small Perl script. This script parsed a Web page, executed the SQL statements in it, and inserted the results. We would have used PHP or mod_perl instead, but they were not available at the time.

For graphical data, we wrote a simple tool in C that could process SQL query results and produce GIF images based on those results. This tool also was dynamically executed from the Perl script that parses the Web pages.

In most cases, a new report could be created simply by copying an existing script and modifying the SQL query in it. In some cases, we needed to add more columns to an existing summary table or generate a new one. This also was quite simple because we kept all transaction-storage tables on disk. (This amounted to about 50GB of transaction tables and 200GB of other customer data.)

We also let our customers access the summary tables directly with ODBC so that the advanced users could experiment with the data themselves.

This system worked well and we had no problems handling the data with quite modest Sun Ultra SPARCstation hardware (2x200MHz). Eventually the system was migrated to Linux.

7.1.4 The MySQL Benchmark Suite

This section should contain a technical description of the MySQL benchmark suite (and crash-me), but that description has not yet been written. Currently, you can get a good idea of the benchmarks by looking at the code and results in the `sql-bench' directory in any MySQL source distribution.

This benchmark suite is meant to tell any user what operations a given SQL implementation performs well or poorly.

Note that this benchmark is single-threaded, so it measures the minimum time for the operations performed. We plan to add multi-threaded tests to the benchmark suite in the future.

To use the benchmark suite, the following requirements must be satisfied:

After you obtain a MySQL source distribution, you will find the benchmark suite located in its `sql-bench' directory. To run the benchmark tests, build MySQL, then change location into the `sql-bench' directory and execute the run-all-tests script:

shell> cd sql-bench
shell> perl run-all-tests --server=server_name

server_name is one of the supported servers. To get a list of all options and supported servers, invoke this command:

shell> perl run-all-tests --help

The crash-me script also is located in the `sql-bench' directory. crash-me tries to determine what features a database supports and what its capabilities and limitations are by actually running queries. For example, it determines:

You can find the results from crash-me for many different database servers at http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/crash-me.php. For more information about benchmark results, visit http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/benchmarks/.

7.1.5 Using Your Own Benchmarks

You should definitely benchmark your application and database to find out where the bottlenecks are. By fixing a bottleneck (or by replacing it with a ``dummy module''), you can then easily identify the next bottleneck. Even if the overall performance for your application currently is acceptable, you should at least make a plan for each bottleneck, and decide how to solve it if someday you really need the extra performance.

For an example of portable benchmark programs, look at the MySQL benchmark suite. See section 7.1.4 The MySQL Benchmark Suite. You can take any program from this suite and modify it for your needs. By doing this, you can try different solutions to your problem and test which really is fastest for you.

Another free benchmark suite is the Open Source Database Benchmark, available at http://osdb.sourceforge.net/.

It is very common for a problem to occur only when the system is very heavily loaded. We have had many customers who contact us when they have a (tested) system in production and have encountered load problems. In most cases, performance problems turn out to be due to issues of basic database design (for example, table scans are not good at high load) or problems with the operating system or libraries. Most of the time, these problems would be a lot easier to fix if the systems were not already in production.

To avoid problems like this, you should put some effort into benchmarking your whole application under the worst possible load! You can use Super Smack for this. It is available at http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/super-smack/. As the name suggests, it can bring a system to its knees if you ask it, so make sure to use it only on your development systems.

7.2 Optimizing SELECT Statements and Other Queries

First, one factor affects all statements: The more complex your permission setup is, the more overhead you will have.

Using simpler permissions when you issue GRANT statements enables MySQL to reduce permission-checking overhead when clients execute statements. For example, if you don't grant any table-level or column-level privileges, the server need not ever check the contents of the tables_priv and columns_priv tables. Similarly, if you place no resource limits on any accounts, the server does not have to perform resource counting. If you have a very high query volume, it may be worth the time to use a simplified grant structure to reduce permission-checking overhead.

If your problem is with some specific MySQL expression or function, you can use the BENCHMARK() function from the mysql client program to perform a timing test. Its syntax is BENCHMARK(loop_count,expression). For example:

mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(1000000,1+1);
| BENCHMARK(1000000,1+1) |
|                      0 |
1 row in set (0.32 sec)

This result was obtained on a Pentium II 400MHz system. It shows that MySQL can execute 1,000,000 simple addition expressions in 0.32 seconds on that system.

All MySQL functions should be very optimized, but there may be some exceptions. BENCHMARK() is a great tool to find out if this is a problem with your query.

7.2.1 EXPLAIN Syntax (Get Information About a SELECT)

EXPLAIN tbl_name


EXPLAIN SELECT select_options

The EXPLAIN statement can be used either as a synonym for DESCRIBE or as a way to obtain information about how MySQL will execute a SELECT statement:

This section provides information about the second use of EXPLAIN.

With the help of EXPLAIN, you can see when you must add indexes to tables to get a faster SELECT that uses indexes to find records.

If you have a problem with incorrect index usage, you should run ANALYZE TABLE to update table statistics such as cardinality of keys, which can affect the choices the optimizer makes. See section ANALYZE TABLE Syntax.

You can also see whether the optimizer joins the tables in an optimal order. To force the optimizer to use a join order corresponding to the order in which the tables are named in the SELECT statement, begin the statement with SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN rather than just SELECT.

EXPLAIN returns a row of information for each table used in the SELECT statement. The tables are listed in the output in the order that MySQL would read them while processing the query. MySQL resolves all joins using a single-sweep multi-join method. This means that MySQL reads a row from the first table, then finds a matching row in the second table, then in the third table, and so on. When all tables are processed, it outputs the selected columns and backtracks through the table list until a table is found for which there are more matching rows. The next row is read from this table and the process continues with the next table.

In MySQL version 4.1, the EXPLAIN output format was changed to work better with constructs such as UNION statements, subqueries, and derived tables. Most notable is the addition of two new columns: id and select_type. You will not see these columns when using servers older than MySQL 4.1.

Each output row from EXPLAIN provides information about one table, and each row consists of the following columns:

The SELECT identifier. This is the sequential number of the SELECT within the query.
The type of SELECT, which can be any of the following:
Simple SELECT (not using UNION or subqueries)
Outermost SELECT
Second or later SELECT statement in a UNION
Second or later SELECT statement in a UNION, dependent on outer subquery
First SELECT in subquery
First SELECT in subquery, dependent on outer subquery
Derived table SELECT (subquery in FROM clause)
The table to which the row of output refers.
The join type. The different join types are listed here, ordered from the best type to the worst:
The table has only one row (= system table). This is a special case of the const join type.
The table has at most one matching row, which will be read at the start of the query. Because there is only one row, values from the column in this row can be regarded as constants by the rest of the optimizer. const tables are very fast because they are read only once! const is used when you compare all parts of a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE index with constant values. In the following queries, tbl_name can be used as a const table:
SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE primary_key=1;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name
WHERE primary_key_part1=1 AND primary_key_part2=2;
One row will be read from this table for each combination of rows from the previous tables. Other than the const types, this is the best possible join type. It is used when all parts of an index are used by the join and the index is a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE index. eq_ref can be used for indexed columns that are compared using the = operator. The comparison value can be a constant or an expression that uses columns from tables that are read before this table. In the following examples, MySQL can use an eq_ref join to process ref_table:
SELECT * FROM ref_table,other_table
WHERE ref_table.key_column=other_table.column;

SELECT * FROM ref_table,other_table
WHERE ref_table.key_column_part1=other_table.column
AND ref_table.key_column_part2=1;
All rows with matching index values will be read from this table for each combination of rows from the previous tables. ref is used if the join uses only a leftmost prefix of the key or if the key is not a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE index (in other words, if the join cannot select a single row based on the key value). If the key that is used matches only a few rows, this is a good join type. ref can be used for indexed columns that are compared using the = operator. In the following examples, MySQL can use a ref join to process ref_table:
SELECT * FROM ref_table WHERE key_column=expr;

SELECT * FROM ref_table,other_table
WHERE ref_table.key_column=other_table.column;

SELECT * FROM ref_table,other_table
WHERE ref_table.key_column_part1=other_table.column
AND ref_table.key_column_part2=1;
This join type is like ref, but with the addition that MySQL will do an extra search for rows that contain NULL values. This join type optimization is new for MySQL 4.1.1 and is mostly used when resolving subqueries. In the following examples, MySQL can use a ref_or_null join to process ref_table:
SELECT * FROM ref_table
WHERE key_column=expr OR key_column IS NULL; 
See section 7.2.7 How MySQL Optimizes IS NULL.
This join type indicates that the Index Merge optimization is used. In this case, the key column contains a list of indexes used, and key_len contains a list of the longest key parts for the indexes used. For more information, see section 7.2.6 Index Merge Optimization.
This type replaces ref for some IN subqueries of the following form:
value IN (SELECT primary_key FROM single_table WHERE some_expr) 
unique_subquery is just an index lookup function that replaces the subquery completely for better efficiency.
This join type is similar to unique_subquery. It replaces IN subqueries, but it works for non-unique indexes in subqueries of the following form:
value IN (SELECT key_column FROM single_table WHERE some_expr) 
Only rows that are in a given range will be retrieved, using an index to select the rows. The key column indicates which index is used. The key_len contains the longest key part that was used. The ref column will be NULL for this type. range can be used for when a key column is compared to a constant using any of the =, <>, >, >=, <, <=, IS NULL, <=>, BETWEEN, or IN operators:
SELECT * FROM tbl_name
WHERE key_column = 10;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name
WHERE key_column BETWEEN 10 and 20;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name
WHERE key_column IN (10,20,30);

SELECT * FROM tbl_name
WHERE key_part1= 10 AND key_part2 IN (10,20,30);
This join type is the same as ALL, except that only the index tree is scanned. This usually is faster than ALL, because the index file usually is smaller than the data file. MySQL can use this join type when the query uses only columns that are part of a single index.
A full table scan will be done for each combination of rows from the previous tables. This is normally not good if the table is the first table not marked const, and usually very bad in all other cases. Normally, you can avoid ALL by adding indexes that allow row retrieval from the table based on constant values or column values from earlier tables.
The possible_keys column indicates which indexes MySQL could use to find the rows in this table. Note that this column is totally independent of the order of the tables as displayed in the output from EXPLAIN. That means that some of the keys in possible_keys might not be usable in practice with the generated table order. If this column is NULL, there are no relevant indexes. In this case, you may be able to improve the performance of your query by examining the WHERE clause to see whether it refers to some column or columns that would be suitable for indexing. If so, create an appropriate index and check the query with EXPLAIN again. See section 14.2.2 ALTER TABLE Syntax. To see what indexes a table has, use SHOW INDEX FROM tbl_name.
The key column indicates the key (index) that MySQL actually decided to use. The key is NULL if no index was chosen. To force MySQL to use or ignore an index listed in the possible_keys column, use FORCE INDEX, USE INDEX, or IGNORE INDEX in your query. See section 14.1.7 SELECT Syntax. For MyISAM and BDB tables, running ANALYZE TABLE will help the optimizer choose better indexes. For MyISAM tables, myisamchk --analyze will do the same. See section ANALYZE TABLE Syntax and section 5.7.2 Table Maintenance and Crash Recovery.
The key_len column indicates the length of the key that MySQL decided to use. The length is NULL if the key column says NULL. Note that the value of key_len allows you to determine how many parts of a multiple-part key MySQL will actually use.
The ref column shows which columns or constants are used with the key to select rows from the table.
The rows column indicates the number of rows MySQL believes it must examine to execute the query.
This column contains additional information about how MySQL will resolve the query. Here is an explanation of the different text strings that can appear in this column:
MySQL will stop searching for more rows for the current row combination after it has found the first matching row.
Not exists
MySQL was able to do a LEFT JOIN optimization on the query and will not examine more rows in this table for the previous row combination after it finds one row that matches the LEFT JOIN criteria. Here is an example of the type of query that can be optimized this way:
SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.id=t2.id
Assume that t2.id is defined as NOT NULL. In this case, MySQL will scan t1 and look up the rows in t2 using the values of t1.id. If MySQL finds a matching row in t2, it knows that t2.id can never be NULL, and will not scan through the rest of the rows in t2 that have the same id value. In other words, for each row in t1, MySQL needs to do only a single lookup in t2, regardless of how many rows actually match in t2.
range checked for each record (index map: #)
MySQL found no good index to use, but found that some of indexes might be used once column values from preceding tables are known. For each row combination in the preceding tables, MySQL will check whether it is possible to use a range or index_merge access method to retrieve rows. The applicability criteria are as described in section 7.2.5 Range Optimization and section 7.2.6 Index Merge Optimization, with the exception that all column values for the preceding table are known and considered to be constants. This is not very fast, but is faster than performing a join with no index at all.
Using filesort
MySQL will need to do an extra pass to find out how to retrieve the rows in sorted order. The sort is done by going through all rows according to the join type and storing the sort key and pointer to the row for all rows that match the WHERE clause. The keys then are sorted and the rows are retrieved in sorted order. See section 7.2.10 How MySQL Optimizes ORDER BY.
Using index
The column information is retrieved from the table using only information in the index tree without having to do an additional seek to read the actual row. This strategy can be used when the query uses only columns that are part of a single index.
Using temporary
To resolve the query, MySQL will need to create a temporary table to hold the result. This typically happens if the query contains GROUP BY and ORDER BY clauses that list columns differently.
Using where
A WHERE clause will be used to restrict which rows to match against the next table or send to the client. Unless you specifically intend to fetch or examine all rows from the table, you may have something wrong in your query if the Extra value is not Using where and the table join type is ALL or index.
If you want to make your queries as fast as possible, you should look out for Extra values of Using filesort and Using temporary.
Using sort_union(...)
Using union(...)
Using intersect(...)
These indicate how index scans are merged for the index_merge join type. See section 7.2.6 Index Merge Optimization for more information.

You can get a good indication of how good a join is by taking the product of the values in the rows column of the EXPLAIN output. This should tell you roughly how many rows MySQL must examine to execute the query. If you restrict queries with the max_join_size system variable, this product also is used to determine which multiple-table SELECT statements to execute. See section 7.5.2 Tuning Server Parameters.

The following example shows how a multiple-table join can be optimized progressively based on the information provided by EXPLAIN.

Suppose that you have the SELECT statement shown here and you plan to examine it using EXPLAIN:

EXPLAIN SELECT tt.TicketNumber, tt.TimeIn,
            tt.ProjectReference, tt.EstimatedShipDate,
            tt.ActualShipDate, tt.ClientID,
            tt.ServiceCodes, tt.RepetitiveID,
            tt.CurrentProcess, tt.CurrentDPPerson,
            tt.RecordVolume, tt.DPPrinted, et.COUNTRY,
            et_1.COUNTRY, do.CUSTNAME
        FROM tt, et, et AS et_1, do
        WHERE tt.SubmitTime IS NULL
            AND tt.ActualPC = et.EMPLOYID
            AND tt.AssignedPC = et_1.EMPLOYID
            AND tt.ClientID = do.CUSTNMBR;

For this example, make the following assumptions:

Initially, before any optimizations have been performed, the EXPLAIN statement produces the following information:

table type possible_keys key  key_len ref  rows  Extra
et    ALL  PRIMARY       NULL NULL    NULL 74
do    ALL  PRIMARY       NULL NULL    NULL 2135
et_1  ALL  PRIMARY       NULL NULL    NULL 74
tt    ALL  AssignedPC,   NULL NULL    NULL 3872
      range checked for each record (key map: 35)

Because type is ALL for each table, this output indicates that MySQL is generating a Cartesian product of all the tables; that is, every combination of rows. This will take quite a long time, because the product of the number of rows in each table must be examined. For the case at hand, this product is 74 * 2135 * 74 * 3872 = 45,268,558,720 rows. If the tables were bigger, you can only imagine how long it would take.

One problem here is that MySQL can use indexes on columns more efficiently if they are declared the same. (For ISAM tables, indexes may not be used at all unless the columns are declared the same.) In this context, VARCHAR and CHAR are the same unless they are declared as different lengths. Because tt.ActualPC is declared as CHAR(10) and et.EMPLOYID is declared as CHAR(15), there is a length mismatch.

To fix this disparity between column lengths, use ALTER TABLE to lengthen ActualPC from 10 characters to 15 characters:


Now tt.ActualPC and et.EMPLOYID are both VARCHAR(15). Executing the EXPLAIN statement again produces this result:

table type   possible_keys key     key_len ref         rows    Extra
tt    ALL    AssignedPC,   NULL    NULL    NULL        3872    Using
             ClientID,                                         where
do    ALL    PRIMARY       NULL    NULL    NULL        2135
      range checked for each record (key map: 1)
et_1  ALL    PRIMARY       NULL    NULL    NULL        74
      range checked for each record (key map: 1)
et    eq_ref PRIMARY       PRIMARY 15      tt.ActualPC 1

This is not perfect, but is much better: The product of the rows values is now less by a factor of 74. This version is executed in a couple of seconds.

A second alteration can be made to eliminate the column length mismatches for the tt.AssignedPC = et_1.EMPLOYID and tt.ClientID = do.CUSTNMBR comparisons:

mysql> ALTER TABLE tt MODIFY AssignedPC VARCHAR(15),
    ->                MODIFY ClientID   VARCHAR(15);

Now EXPLAIN produces the output shown here:

table type   possible_keys key      key_len ref           rows Extra
et    ALL    PRIMARY       NULL     NULL    NULL          74
tt    ref    AssignedPC,   ActualPC 15      et.EMPLOYID   52   Using
             ClientID,                                         where
et_1  eq_ref PRIMARY       PRIMARY  15      tt.AssignedPC 1
do    eq_ref PRIMARY       PRIMARY  15      tt.ClientID   1

This is almost as good as it can get.

The remaining problem is that, by default, MySQL assumes that values in the tt.ActualPC column are evenly distributed, and that is not the case for the tt table. Fortunately, it is easy to tell MySQL to analyze the key distribution:

mysql> ANALYZE TABLE tt;

Now the join is perfect, and EXPLAIN produces this result:

table type   possible_keys key     key_len ref           rows Extra
tt    ALL    AssignedPC    NULL    NULL    NULL          3872 Using
             ClientID,                                        where
et    eq_ref PRIMARY       PRIMARY 15      tt.ActualPC   1
et_1  eq_ref PRIMARY       PRIMARY 15      tt.AssignedPC 1
do    eq_ref PRIMARY       PRIMARY 15      tt.ClientID   1

Note that the rows column in the output from EXPLAIN is an educated guess from the MySQL join optimizer. You should check whether the numbers are even close to the truth. If not, you may get better performance by using STRAIGHT_JOIN in your SELECT statement and trying to list the tables in a different order in the FROM clause.

7.2.2 Estimating Query Performance

In most cases, you can estimate the performance by counting disk seeks. For small tables, you can usually find a row in one disk seek (because the index is probably cached). For bigger tables, you can estimate that, using B-tree indexes, you will need this many seeks to find a row: log(row_count) / log(index_block_length / 3 * 2 / (index_length + data_pointer_length)) + 1.

In MySQL, an index block is usually 1024 bytes and the data pointer is usually 4 bytes. For a 500,000-row table with an index length of 3 bytes (medium integer), the formula indicates log(500,000)/log(1024/3*2/(3+4)) + 1 = 4 seeks.

This index would require storage of about 500,000 * 7 * 3/2 = 5.2MB (assuming a typical index buffer fill ratio of 2/3), so you will probably have much of the index in memory and you will probably need only one or two calls to read data to find the row.

For writes, however, you will need four seek requests (as above) to find where to place the new index and normally two seeks to update the index and write the row.

Note that the preceding discussion doesn't mean that your application performance will slowly degenerate by log N! As long as everything is cached by the OS or SQL server, things will become only marginally slower as the table gets bigger. After the data gets too big to be cached, things will start to go much slower until your applications is only bound by disk-seeks (which increase by log N). To avoid this, increase the key cache size as the data grows. For MyISAM tables, the key cache size is controlled by the key_buffer_size system variable. See section 7.5.2 Tuning Server Parameters.

7.2.3 Speed of SELECT Queries

In general, when you want to make a slow SELECT ... WHERE query faster, the first thing to check is whether you can add an index. All references between different tables should usually be done with indexes. You can use the EXPLAIN statement to determine which indexes are used for a SELECT. See section 7.4.5 How MySQL Uses Indexes and section 7.2.1 EXPLAIN Syntax (Get Information About a SELECT).

Some general tips for speeding up queries on MyISAM tables:

7.2.4 How MySQL Optimizes WHERE Clauses

This section discusses optimizations that can be made for processing WHERE clauses. The examples use SELECT statements, but the same optimizations apply for WHERE clauses in DELETE and UPDATE statements.

Note that work on the MySQL optimizer is ongoing, so this section is incomplete. MySQL does many optimizations, not all of which are documented here.

Some of the optimizations performed by MySQL are listed here:

Some examples of queries that are very fast:

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl_name;

SELECT MIN(key_part1),MAX(key_part1) FROM tbl_name;

SELECT MAX(key_part2) FROM tbl_name
    WHERE key_part1=constant;

SELECT ... FROM tbl_name
    ORDER BY key_part1,key_part2,... LIMIT 10;

SELECT ... FROM tbl_name
    ORDER BY key_part1 DESC, key_part2 DESC, ... LIMIT 10;

The following queries are resolved using only the index tree, assuming that the indexed columns are numeric:

SELECT key_part1,key_part2 FROM tbl_name WHERE key_part1=val;

    WHERE key_part1=val1 AND key_part2=val2;

SELECT key_part2 FROM tbl_name GROUP BY key_part1;

The following queries use indexing to retrieve the rows in sorted order without a separate sorting pass:

SELECT ... FROM tbl_name
    ORDER BY key_part1,key_part2,... ;

SELECT ... FROM tbl_name
    ORDER BY key_part1 DESC, key_part2 DESC, ... ;

7.2.5 Range Optimization

The range access method uses a single index to retrieve a subset of table records that are contained within one or several index value intervals. It can be used for a single-part or multiple-part index. A detailed description of how intervals are extracted from the WHERE clause is given in the following sections. Range Access Method for Single-Part Indexes

For single-part indexes, index value intervals can be conveniently represented by corresponding conditions in the WHERE clause, so we'll talk about ``range conditions'' instead of intervals.

The definition of a range condition for single-part indexes is as follows:

``Constant value'' in the preceding descriptions means one of the following:

Here are some examples of queries with range conditions in the WHERE clause:

SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key_col > 1 AND key_col < 10;

SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key_col = 1 OR key_col IN (15,18,20);

SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key_col LIKE 'ab%' OR key_col BETWEEN 
'bar' AND 'foo';

Note that some non-constant values may be converted to constants during the constant propagation phase.

MySQL tries to extract range conditions from the WHERE clause for each of the possible indexes. During the extraction process, conditions that can't be used for constructing the range condition are dropped, conditions that produce overlapping ranges are combined, and conditions that produce empty ranges are removed.

For example, consider the following statement, where key1 is an indexed column and nonkey is not indexed:

   (key1 < 'abc' AND (key1 LIKE 'abcde%' OR key1 LIKE '%b')) OR
   (key1 < 'bar' AND nonkey = 4) OR
   (key1 < 'uux' AND key1 > 'z');

The extraction process for key key1 is as follows:

  1. Start with original WHERE clause:
    (key1 < 'abc' AND (key1 LIKE 'abcde%' OR key1 LIKE '%b')) OR
    (key1 < 'bar' AND nonkey = 4) OR
    (key1 < 'uux' AND key1 > 'z')
  2. Remove nonkey = 4 and key1 LIKE '%b' because they cannot be used for a range scan. The right way to remove them is to replace them with TRUE, so that we don't miss any matching records when doing the range scan. Having replaced them with TRUE, we get:
    (key1 < 'abc' AND (key1 LIKE 'abcde%' OR TRUE)) OR
    (key1 < 'bar' AND TRUE) OR
    (key1 < 'uux' AND key1 > 'z')
  3. Collapse conditions that are always true or false: Replacing these conditions with constants, we get:
    (key1 < 'abc' AND TRUE) OR (key1 < 'bar' AND TRUE) OR (FALSE)
    Removing unnecessary TRUE and FALSE constants, we obtain
    (key1 < 'abc') OR (key1 < 'bar')
  4. Combining overlapping intervals into one yields the final condition to be used for the range scan:
    (key1 < 'bar')

In general (and as demonstrated in the example), the condition used for a range scan is less restrictive than the WHERE clause. MySQL will perform an additional check to filter out rows that satisfy the range condition but not the full WHERE clause.

The range condition extraction algorithm can handle nested AND/OR constructs of arbitrary depth, and its output doesn't depend on the order in which conditions appear in WHERE clause. Range Access Method for Multiple-Part Indexes

Range conditions on a multiple-part key are an extension of range conditions for a single-part key. A range condition on a multiple-part key restricts index records to lie within one or several key tuple intervals. Key tuple intervals are defined over a set of key tuples, using ordering from the index.

For example, consider a multiple-part key defined as key1(key_part1, key_part2, key_part3), and the following set of key tuples listed in key order:

key_part1  key_part2  key_part3
  NULL       1          'abc'
  NULL       1          'xyz'
  NULL       2          'foo'
   1         1          'abc'
   1         1          'xyz'
   1         2          'abc'
   2         1          'aaa'

The condition key_part1 = 1 defines this interval:

(1, -inf, -inf) <= (key_part1, key_part2, key_part3) < (1, +inf, +inf)

The interval covers the 4th, 5th, and 6th tuples in the preceding data set and can be used by the range access method.

By contrast, the condition key_part3 = 'abc' does not define a single interval and cannot be used by the range access method.

The following descriptions indicate how range conditions work for multiple-part indexes in greater detail.

section Range Access Method for Single-Part Indexes describes how optimizations are performed to combine or eliminate intervals for range conditions on single-part keys. Analogous steps are performed for range conditions on multiple-part keys.

7.2.6 Index Merge Optimization

The Index Merge method is used to retrieve rows with several ref, ref_or_null, or range scans and merge the results into one. This method is employed when the table condition is a disjunction of conditions for which ref, ref_or_null, or range could be used with different keys.

This ``join'' type optimization is new in MySQL 5.0.0, and represents a significant change in behavior with regard to indexes, because the old rule was that the server is only ever able to use at most one index for each referenced table.

In EXPLAIN output, this method appears as index_merge in the type column. In this case, the key column contains a list of indexes used, and key_len contains a list of the longest key parts for those indexes.


SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_part1 = 10 OR key_part2 = 20;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name
    WHERE (key_part1 = 10 OR key_part2 = 20) AND non_key_part=30;

    WHERE (t1.key1 IN (1,2) OR t1.key2 LIKE 'value%')
    AND t2.key1=t1.some_col;

    WHERE t1.key1=1
    AND (t2.key1=t1.some_col OR t2.key2=t1.some_col2);

The Index Merge method has several access algorithms (seen in the Extra field of EXPLAIN output):

The following sections describe these methods in greater detail.

Note: The result of the Index Merge optimization algorithm may depend on AND/OR construct nesting and the order of conditions in the query WHERE clause. If your query has complex WHERE clause with deep AND/OR nesting and MySQL doesn't find the optimal plan, try opening brackets and permuting conditions.

The choice between different possible variants of the index_merge access method and other access methods is based on cost estimates of various available options. Index Merge Intersection Access Algorithm

This access algorithm can be employed when a WHERE clause was converted to several range conditions on different keys combined with AND, and each condition is one of the following:

Here are some examples:

SELECT * FROM innodb_table WHERE primary_key < 10 AND key_col1=20;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE (key1_part1=1 AND key1_part2=2) AND key2=2;

The Index Merge intersection algorithm performs simultaneous scans on all used indexes and produces the intersection of row sequences that it receives from the merged index scans.

If all columns used in the query are covered by the used indexes, full table records will not be retrieved (EXPLAIN output will contain ``Using index'' in Extra field in this case). Here is an example of such query:

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 WHERE key1=1 AND key2=1;

If the used indexes don't cover all columns used in the query, full records will be retrieved only when the range conditions for all used keys are satisfied.

If one of the merged conditions is a condition over a primary key of an InnoDB or BDB table, it is not used for record retrieval, but is used to filter out records retrieved using other conditions. Index Merge Union Access Algorithm

The applicability criteria for this algorithm are similar to those of the Index Merge method intersection algorithm. The algorithm can be employed when the table WHERE clause was converted to several range conditions on different keys combined with OR, and each condition is one of the following:

Here are some examples:

SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key1=1 OR key2=2 OR key3=3;

SELECT * FROM innodb_table WHERE (key1=1 AND key2=2) OR
  (key3='foo' AND key4='bar') AND key5=5; Index Merge Sort-Union Access Algorithm

This access algorithm is employed when the WHERE clause was converted to several range conditions combined by OR, but for which the Index Merge method union algorithm is not applicable.

Here are some examples:

SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_col1 < 10 OR key_col2 < 20;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name
     WHERE (key_col1 > 10 OR key_col2 = 20) AND nonkey_col=30;

The difference between the sort-union algorithm and the union algorithm is that the sort-union algorithm must first fetch row IDs for all records and sort them before returning any records.

7.2.7 How MySQL Optimizes IS NULL

MySQL can do the same optimization on col_name IS NULL that it can do with col_name = constant_value. For example, MySQL can use indexes and ranges to search for NULL with IS NULL.

SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_col IS NULL;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_col <=> NULL;

SELECT * FROM tbl_name
    WHERE key_col=const1 OR key_col=const2 OR key_col IS NULL;

If a WHERE clause includes a col_name IS NULL condition for a column that is declared as NOT NULL, that expression will be optimized away. This optimization does not occur in cases when the column might produce NULL anyway; for example, if it comes from a table on the right side of a LEFT JOIN.

MySQL 4.1.1 and up can additionally optimize the combination col_name = expr AND col_name IS NULL, a form that is common in resolved subqueries. EXPLAIN will show ref_or_null when this optimization is used.

This optimization can handle one IS NULL for any key part.

Some examples of queries that are optimized, assuming that there is an index on columns a and b of table t2:

SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE t1.a=expr OR t1.a IS NULL;

SELECT * FROM t1,t2 WHERE t1.a=t2.a OR t2.a IS NULL;

    WHERE (t1.a=t2.a OR t2.a IS NULL) AND t2.b=t1.b;

    WHERE t1.a=t2.a AND (t2.b=t1.b OR t2.b IS NULL);

    WHERE (t1.a=t2.a AND t2.a IS NULL AND ...)
    OR (t1.a=t2.a AND t2.a IS NULL AND ...);

ref_or_null works by first doing a read on the reference key, and then a separate search for rows with a NULL key value.

Note that the optimization can handle only one IS NULL level. In the following query, MySQL will use key lookups only on the expression (t1.a=t2.a AND t2.a IS NULL) and not be able to use the key part on b:

     WHERE (t1.a=t2.a AND t2.a IS NULL)
     OR (t1.b=t2.b AND t2.b IS NULL);

7.2.8 How MySQL Optimizes DISTINCT

DISTINCT combined with ORDER BY will need a temporary table in many cases.

Note that because DISTINCT may use GROUP BY, you should be aware of how MySQL works with columns in ORDER BY or HAVING clauses that are not part of the selected columns. See section 13.9.3 GROUP BY with Hidden Fields.

When combining LIMIT row_count with DISTINCT, MySQL stops as soon as it finds row_count unique rows.

If you don't use columns from all tables named in a query, MySQL stops scanning the not-used tables as soon as it finds the first match. In the following case, assuming that t1 is used before t2 (which you can check with EXPLAIN), MySQL stops reading from t2 (for any particular row in t1) when the first row in t2 is found:

SELECT DISTINCT t1.a FROM t1,t2 where t1.a=t2.a;

7.2.9 How MySQL Optimizes LEFT JOIN and RIGHT JOIN

A LEFT JOIN B join_condition is implemented in MySQL as follows:

RIGHT JOIN is implemented analogously to LEFT JOIN, with the roles of the tables reversed.

The join optimizer calculates the order in which tables should be joined. The table read order forced by LEFT JOIN and STRAIGHT_JOIN helps the join optimizer do its work much more quickly, because there are fewer table permutations to check. Note that this means that if you do a query of the following type, MySQL will do a full scan on b because the LEFT JOIN forces it to be read before d:

    FROM a,b LEFT JOIN c ON (c.key=a.key) LEFT JOIN d ON (d.key=a.key)
    WHERE b.key=d.key;

The fix in this case is to rewrite the query as follows:

    FROM b,a LEFT JOIN c ON (c.key=a.key) LEFT JOIN d ON (d.key=a.key)
    WHERE b.key=d.key;

Starting from 4.0.14, MySQL does the following LEFT JOIN optimization: If the WHERE condition is always false for the generated NULL row, the LEFT JOIN is changed to a normal join.

For example, the WHERE clause would be false in the following query if t2.column1 would be NULL:

SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON (column1) WHERE t2.column2=5;

Therefore, it's safe to convert the query to a normal join:

SELECT * FROM t1,t2 WHERE t2.column2=5 AND t1.column1=t2.column1;

This can be made faster because MySQL can now use table t2 before table t1 if this would result in a better query plan. To force a specific table order, use STRAIGHT_JOIN.

7.2.10 How MySQL Optimizes ORDER BY

In some cases, MySQL can use an index to satisfy an ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause without doing any extra sorting.

The index can also be used even if the ORDER BY doesn't match the index exactly, as long as all the unused index parts and all the extra are ORDER BY columns are constants in the WHERE clause. The following queries will use the index to resolve the ORDER BY or GROUP BY part:

SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY key_part1,key_part2,... ;
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key_part1=constant ORDER BY key_part2;
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key_part1=constant GROUP BY key_part2;
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY key_part1 DESC, key_part2 DESC;
    WHERE key_part1=1 ORDER BY key_part1 DESC, key_part2 DESC;

In some cases, MySQL cannot use indexes to resolve the ORDER BY, although it still will use indexes to find the rows that match the WHERE clause. These cases include the following:

With EXPLAIN SELECT ... ORDER BY, you can check whether MySQL can use indexes to resolve the query. It cannot if you see Using filesort in the Extra column. See section 7.2.1 EXPLAIN Syntax (Get Information About a SELECT).

In those cases where MySQL must sort the result, it uses the following filesort algorithm before MySQL 4.1:

  1. Read all rows according to key or by table scanning. Rows that don't match the WHERE clause are skipped.
  2. For each row, store a pair of values in a buffer (the sort key and the row pointer). The size of the buffer is the value of the sort_buffer_size system variable.
  3. When the buffer gets full, run a qsort (quicksort) on it and store the result in a temporary file. Save a pointer to the sorted block. (If all pairs fit into the sort buffer, no temporary file is created.)
  4. Repeat the preceding steps until all rows have been read.
  5. Do a multi-merge of up to MERGEBUFF (7) regions to one block in another temporary file. Repeat until all blocks from the first file are in the second file.
  6. Repeat the following until there are fewer than MERGEBUFF2 (15) blocks left.
  7. On the last multi-merge, only the pointer to the row (the last part of the sort key) is written to a result file.
  8. Read the rows in sorted order by using the row pointers in the result file. To optimize this, we read in a big block of row pointers, sort them, and use them to read the rows in sorted order into a row buffer. The size of the buffer is the value of the read_rnd_buffer_size system variable. The code for this step is in the `sql/records.cc' source file.

One problem with this approach is that it reads rows twice: One time when evaluating the WHERE clause, and again after sorting the pair values. And even if the rows were accessed successively the first time (for example, if a table scan is done), the second time they are accessed randomly. (The sort keys are ordered, but the row positions are not.)

In MySQL 4.1 and up, a filesort optimization is used that records not only the sort key value and row position, but also the columns required for the query. This avoids reading the rows twice. The modified filesort algorithm works like this:

  1. Read the rows that match the WHERE clause, as before.
  2. For each row, record a tuple of values consisting of the sort key value and row position, and also the columns required for the query.
  3. Sort the tuples by sort key value
  4. Retrieve the rows in sorted order, but read the required columns directly from the sorted tuples rather than by accessing the table a second time.

Using the modified filesort algorithm, the tuples are longer than the pairs used in the original method, and fewer of them fit in the sort buffer (the size of which is given by sort_buffer_size). As a result, it is possible for the extra I/O to make the modified approach slower, not faster. To avoid a slowdown, the optimization is used only if the total size of the extra columns in the sort tuple does not exceed the value of the max_length_for_sort_data system variable. (A symptom of setting the value of this variable too high is that you will see high disk activity and low CPU activity.)

If you want to increase ORDER BY speed, first see whether you can get MySQL to use indexes rather than an extra sorting phase. If this is not possible, you can try the following strategies:

By default, MySQL sorts all GROUP BY col1, col2, ... queries as if you specified ORDER BY col1, col2, ... in the query as well. If you include an ORDER BY clause explicitly that contains the same column list, MySQL optimizes it away without any speed penalty, although the sorting still occurs. If a query includes GROUP BY but you want to avoid the overhead of sorting the result, you can suppress sorting by specifying ORDER BY NULL. For example:


7.2.11 How MySQL Optimizes LIMIT

In some cases, MySQL will handle a query differently when you are using LIMIT row_count and not using HAVING:

7.2.12 How to Avoid Table Scans

The output from EXPLAIN will show ALL in the type column when MySQL uses a table scan to resolve a query. This usually happens under the following conditions:

For small tables, a table scan often is appropriate. For large tables, try the following techniques to avoid having the optimizer incorrectly choose a table scan:

7.2.13 Speed of INSERT Statements

The time to insert a record is determined by the following factors, where the numbers indicate approximate proportions:

This does not take into consideration the initial overhead to open tables, which is done once for each concurrently running query.

The size of the table slows down the insertion of indexes by log N, assuming B-tree indexes.

You can use the following methods to speed up inserts:

7.2.14 Speed of UPDATE Statements

Update statements are optimized as a SELECT query with the additional overhead of a write. The speed of the write depends on the amount of data being updated and the number of indexes that are updated. Indexes that are not changed will not be updated.

Also, another way to get fast updates is to delay updates and then do many updates in a row later. Doing many updates in a row is much quicker than doing one at a time if you lock the table.

Note that for a MyISAM table that uses dynamic record format, updating a record to a longer total length may split the record. If you do this often, it is very important to use OPTIMIZE TABLE occasionally. See section OPTIMIZE TABLE Syntax.

7.2.15 Speed of DELETE Statements

The time to delete individual records is exactly proportional to the number of indexes. To delete records more quickly, you can increase the size of the key cache. See section 7.5.2 Tuning Server Parameters.

If you want to delete all rows in the table, use TRUNCATE TABLE tbl_name rather than DELETE FROM tbl_name. See section 14.1.9 TRUNCATE Syntax.

7.2.16 Other Optimization Tips

This section lists a number of miscellaneous tips for improving query processing speed:

7.3 Locking Issues

7.3.1 Locking Methods

Currently, MySQL supports table-level locking for ISAM, MyISAM, and MEMORY (HEAP) tables, page-level locking for BDB tables, and row-level locking for InnoDB tables.

In many cases, you can make an educated guess about which locking type is best for an application, but generally it's very hard to say that a given lock type is better than another. Everything depends on the application and different parts of an application may require different lock types.

To decide whether you want to use a storage engine with row-level locking, you will want to look at what your application does and what mix of select and update statements it uses. For example, most Web applications do lots of selects, very few deletes, updates based mainly on key values, and inserts into some specific tables. The base MySQL MyISAM setup is very well tuned for this.

Table locking in MySQL is deadlock-free for storage engines that use table-level locking. Deadlock avoidance is managed by always requesting all needed locks at once at the beginning of a query and always locking the tables in the same order.

The table-locking method MySQL uses for WRITE locks works as follows:

The table-locking method MySQL uses for READ locks works as follows:

When a lock is released, the lock is made available to the threads in the write lock queue, then to the threads in the read lock queue.

This means that if you have many updates for a table, SELECT statements will wait until there are no more updates.

Starting in MySQL 3.23.33, you can analyze the table lock contention on your system by checking the Table_locks_waited and Table_locks_immediate status variables:

mysql> SHOW STATUS LIKE 'Table%';
| Variable_name         | Value   |
| Table_locks_immediate | 1151552 |
| Table_locks_waited    | 15324   |

As of MySQL 3.23.7 (3.23.25 for Windows), you can freely mix concurrent INSERT and SELECT statements for a MyISAM table without locks if the INSERT statements are non-conflicting. That is, you can insert rows into a MyISAM table at the same time other clients are reading from it. No conflict occurs if the data file contains no free blocks in the middle, because in that case, records always are inserted at the end of the data file. (Holes can result from rows having been deleted from or updated in the middle of the table.) If there are holes, concurrent inserts are re-enabled automatically when all holes have been filled with new data.

If you want to do many INSERT and SELECT operations on a table when concurrent inserts are not possible, you can insert rows in a temporary table and update the real table with the records from the temporary table once in a while. This can be done with the following code:

mysql> LOCK TABLES real_table WRITE, insert_table WRITE;
mysql> INSERT INTO real_table SELECT * FROM insert_table;
mysql> TRUNCATE TABLE insert_table;

InnoDB uses row locks and BDB uses page locks. For the InnoDB and BDB storage engines, deadlock is possible. This is because InnoDB automatically acquires row locks and BDB acquires page locks during the processing of SQL statements, not at the start of the transaction.

Advantages of row-level locking:

Disadvantages of row-level locking:

Table locks are superior to page-level or row-level locks in the following cases:

Options other than row-level or page-level locking:

Versioning (such as we use in MySQL for concurrent inserts) where you can have one writer at the same time as many readers. This means that the database/table supports different views for the data depending on when you started to access it. Other names for this are time travel, copy on write, or copy on demand.

Copy on demand is in many cases much better than page-level or row-level locking. However, the worst case does use much more memory than when using normal locks.

Instead of using row-level locks, you can use application-level locks, such as GET_LOCK() and RELEASE_LOCK() in MySQL. These are advisory locks, so they work only in well-behaved applications.

7.3.2 Table Locking Issues

To achieve a very high lock speed, MySQL uses table locking (instead of page, row, or column locking) for all storage engines except InnoDB and BDB.

For InnoDB and BDB tables, MySQL only uses table locking if you explicitly lock the table with LOCK TABLES. For these table types, we recommend you to not use LOCK TABLES at all, because InnoDB uses automatic row-level locking and BDB uses page-level locking to ensure transaction isolation.

For large tables, table locking is much better than row locking for most applications, but there are some pitfalls.

Table locking enables many threads to read from a table at the same time, but if a thread wants to write to a table, it must first get exclusive access. During the update, all other threads that want to access this particular table must wait until the update is done.

Table updates normally are considered to be more important than table retrievals, so they are given higher priority. This should ensure that updates to a table are not ``starved'' even if there is heavy SELECT activity for the table.

Table locking causes problems in cases such as when a thread is waiting because the disk is full and free space needs to become available before the thread can proceed. In this case, all threads that want to access the problem table will also be put in a waiting state until more disk space is made available.

Table locking is also disadvantageous under the following scenario:

The following list describes some ways to avoid or reduce contention caused by table locking:

Here are some tips about table locking in MySQL:

7.4 Optimizing Database Structure

7.4.1 Design Choices

MySQL keeps row data and index data in separate files. Many (almost all) other databases mix row and index data in the same file. We believe that the MySQL choice is better for a very wide range of modern systems.

Another way to store the row data is to keep the information for each column in a separate area (examples are SDBM and Focus). This will cause a performance hit for every query that accesses more than one column. Because this degenerates so quickly when more than one column is accessed, we believe that this model is not good for general-purpose databases.

The more common case is that the index and data are stored together (as in Oracle/Sybase, et al). In this case, you will find the row information at the leaf page of the index. The good thing with this layout is that it, in many cases, depending on how well the index is cached, saves a disk read. The bad things with this layout are:

7.4.2 Make Your Data as Small as Possible

One of the most basic optimizations is to design your tables to take as little space on the disk as possible. This can give huge improvements because disk reads are faster, and smaller tables normally require less main memory while their contents are being actively processed during query execution. Indexing also is a lesser resource burden if done on smaller columns.

MySQL supports a lot of different table types and row formats. For each table, you can decide which storage/index method to use. Choosing the right table format for your application may give you a big performance gain. See section 15 MySQL Storage Engines and Table Types.

You can get better performance on a table and minimize storage space using the techniques listed here:

7.4.3 Column Indexes

All MySQL column types can be indexed. Use of indexes on the relevant columns is the best way to improve the performance of SELECT operations.

The maximum number of indexes per table and the maximum index length is defined per storage engine. See section 15 MySQL Storage Engines and Table Types. All storage engines support at least 16 indexes per table and a total index length of at least 256 bytes. Most storage engines have higher limits.

With col_name(length) syntax in an index specification, you can create an index that uses only the first length characters of a CHAR or VARCHAR column. Indexing only a prefix of column values like this can make the index file much smaller. See section 7.4.3 Column Indexes.

The MyISAM and (as of MySQL 4.0.14) InnoDB storage engines also support indexing on BLOB and TEXT columns. When indexing a BLOB or TEXT column, you must specify a prefix length for the index. For example:

CREATE TABLE test (blob_col BLOB, INDEX(blob_col(10)));

Prefixes can be up to 255 bytes long (or 1000 bytes for MyISAM and InnoDB tables as of MySQL 4.1.2). Note that prefix limits are measured in bytes, whereas the prefix length in CREATE TABLE statements is interpreted as number of characters. Take this into account when specifying a prefix length for a column that uses a multi-byte character set.

As of MySQL 3.23.23, you can also create FULLTEXT indexes. They are used for full-text searches. Only the MyISAM table type supports FULLTEXT indexes and only for CHAR, VARCHAR, and TEXT columns. Indexing always happens over the entire column and partial (prefix) indexing is not supported. See section 13.6 Full-Text Search Functions for details.

As of MySQL 4.1.0, you can create indexes on spatial column types. Currently, spatial types are supported only by the MyISAM storage engine. Spatial indexes use R-trees.

The MEMORY (HEAP) storage engine supports hash indexes. As of MySQL 4.1.0, the engine also supports B-tree indexes.

7.4.4 Multiple-Column Indexes

MySQL can create indexes on multiple columns. An index may consist of up to 15 columns. For certain column types, you can index a prefix of the column (see section 7.4.3 Column Indexes).

A multiple-column index can be considered a sorted array containing values that are created by concatenating the values of the indexed columns.

MySQL uses multiple-column indexes in such a way that queries are fast when you specify a known quantity for the first column of the index in a WHERE clause, even if you don't specify values for the other columns.

Suppose that a table has the following specification:

    id INT NOT NULL,
    last_name CHAR(30) NOT NULL,
    first_name CHAR(30) NOT NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (id),
    INDEX name (last_name,first_name));

The name index is an index over last_name and first_name. The index can be used for queries that specify values in a known range for last_name, or for both last_name and first_name. Therefore, the name index will be used in the following queries:

SELECT * FROM test WHERE last_name='Widenius';

    WHERE last_name='Widenius' AND first_name='Michael';

    WHERE last_name='Widenius'
    AND (first_name='Michael' OR first_name='Monty');

    WHERE last_name='Widenius'
    AND first_name >='M' AND first_name < 'N';

However, the name index will not be used in the following queries:

SELECT * FROM test WHERE first_name='Michael';

    WHERE last_name='Widenius' OR first_name='Michael';

The manner in which MySQL uses indexes to improve query performance is discussed further in the next section.

7.4.5 How MySQL Uses Indexes

Indexes are used to find rows with specific column values fast. Without an index, MySQL has to start with the first record and then read through the whole table to find the relevant rows. The larger the table, the more this costs. If the table has an index for the columns in question, MySQL can quickly determine the position to seek to in the middle of the data file without having to look at all the data. If a table has 1,000 rows, this is at least 100 times faster than reading sequentially. Note that if you need to access almost all 1,000 rows, it is faster to read sequentially, because that minimizes disk seeks.

Most MySQL indexes (PRIMARY KEY, UNIQUE, INDEX, and FULLTEXT) are stored in B-trees. Exceptions are that indexes on spatial column types use R-trees, and MEMORY (HEAP) tables support hash indexes.

Strings are automatically prefix- and end-space compressed. See section 14.2.5 CREATE INDEX Syntax.

In general, indexes are used as described in the following discussion. Characteristics specific to hash indexes (as used in MEMORY tables) are described at the end of this section.

Suppose that you issue the following SELECT statement:

mysql> SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE col1=val1 AND col2=val2;

If a multiple-column index exists on col1 and col2, the appropriate rows can be fetched directly. If separate single-column indexes exist on col1 and col2, the optimizer tries to find the most restrictive index by deciding which index will find fewer rows and using that index to fetch the rows.

If the table has a multiple-column index, any leftmost prefix of the index can be used by the optimizer to find rows. For example, if you have a three-column index on (col1, col2, col3), you have indexed search capabilities on (col1), (col1, col2), and (col1, col2, col3).

MySQL can't use a partial index if the columns don't form a leftmost prefix of the index. Suppose that you have the SELECT statements shown here:

SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE col1=val1;
SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE col2=val2;
SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE col2=val2 AND col3=val3;

If an index exists on (col1, col2, col3), only the first of the preceding queries uses the index. The second and third queries do involve indexed columns, but (col2) and (col2, col3) are not leftmost prefixes of (col1, col2, col3).

An index is used for columns that you compare with the =, >, >=, <, <=, or BETWEEN operators.

MySQL also uses indexes for LIKE comparisons if the argument to LIKE is a constant string that doesn't start with a wildcard character. For example, the following SELECT statements use indexes:

SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_col LIKE 'Patrick%';
SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_col LIKE 'Pat%_ck%';

In the first statement, only rows with 'Patrick' <= key_col < 'Patricl' are considered. In the second statement, only rows with 'Pat' <= key_col < 'Pau' are considered.

The following SELECT statements will not use indexes:

SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_col LIKE '%Patrick%';
SELECT * FROM tbl_name WHERE key_col LIKE other_col;

In the first statement, the LIKE value begins with a wildcard character. In the second statement, the LIKE value is not a constant.

MySQL 4.0 and up performs an additional LIKE optimization. If you use ... LIKE '%string%' and string is longer than three characters, MySQL will use the Turbo Boyer-Moore algorithm to initialize the pattern for the string and then use this pattern to perform the search quicker.

Searching using col_name IS NULL will use indexes if col_name is indexed.

Any index that doesn't span all AND levels in the WHERE clause is not used to optimize the query. In other words, to be able to use an index, a prefix of the index must be used in every AND group.

The following WHERE clauses use indexes:

... WHERE index_part1=1 AND index_part2=2 AND other_column=3
    /* index = 1 OR index = 2 */
... WHERE index=1 OR A=10 AND index=2
    /* optimized like "index_part1='hello'" */
... WHERE index_part1='hello' AND index_part3=5
    /* Can use index on index1 but not on index2 or index3 */
... WHERE index1=1 AND index2=2 OR index1=3 AND index3=3;

These WHERE clauses do not use indexes:

    /* index_part1 is not used */
... WHERE index_part2=1 AND index_part3=2 
    /* Index is not used in both AND parts */
... WHERE index=1 OR A=10                 
    /* No index spans all rows  */
... WHERE index_part1=1 OR index_part2=10

Sometimes MySQL will not use an index, even if one is available. One way this occurs is when the optimizer estimates that using the index would require MySQL to access a large percentage of the rows in the table. (In this case, a table scan is probably much faster, because it will require many fewer seeks.) However, if such a query uses LIMIT to only retrieve part of the rows, MySQL will use an index anyway, because it can much more quickly find the few rows to return in the result.

Hash indexes have somewhat different characteristics than those just discussed:

7.4.6 The MyISAM Key Cache

To minimize disk I/O, the MyISAM storage engine employs a strategy that is used by many database management systems. It exploits a cache mechanism to keep the most frequently accessed table blocks in memory:

This section first describes the basic operation of the MyISAM key cache. Then it discusses changes made in MySQL 4.1 that improve key cache performance and that enable you to better control cache operation:

The key cache mechanism also is used for ISAM tables. However, the significance of this fact is on the wane. ISAM table use has been decreasing since MySQL 3.23 when MyISAM was introduced. MySQL 4.1 carries this trend further; the ISAM storage engine is disabled by default.

You can control the size of the key cache by means of the key_buffer_size system variable. If this variable is set equal to zero, no key cache is used. The key cache also is not used if the key_buffer_size value is too small to allocate the minimal number of block buffers (8).

When the key cache is not operational, index files are accessed using only the native filesystem buffering provided by the operating system. (In other words, table index blocks are accessed using the same strategy as that employed for table data blocks.)

An index block is a contiguous unit of access to the MyISAM index files. Usually the size of an index block is equal to the size of nodes of the index B-tree. (Indexes are represented on disk using a B-tree data structure. Nodes at the bottom of the tree are leaf nodes. Nodes above the leaf nodes are non-leaf nodes.)

All block buffers in a key cache structure are the same size. This size can be equal to, greater than, or less than the size of a table index block. Usually one these two values is a multiple of the other.

When data from any table index block must be accessed, the server first checks whether it is available in some block buffer of the key cache. If it is, the server accesses data in the key cache rather than on disk. That is, it reads from the cache or writes into it rather than reading from or writing to disk. Otherwise, the server chooses a cache block buffer containing a different table index block (or blocks) and replaces the data there by a copy of required table index block. As soon as the new index block is in the cache, the index data can be accessed.

If it happens that a block selected for replacement has been modified, the block is considered ``dirty.'' In this case, before being replaced, its contents are flushed to the table index from which it came.

Usually the server follows an LRU (Least Recently Used) strategy: When choosing a block for replacement, it selects the least recently used index block. To be able to make such a choice easy, the key cache module maintains a special queue (LRU chain) of all used blocks. When a block is accessed, it is placed at the end of the queue. When blocks need to be replaced, blocks at the beginning of the queue are the least recently used and become the first candidates for eviction. Shared Key Cache Access

Prior to MySQL 4.1, access to the key cache is serialized: No two threads can access key cache buffers simultaneously. The server processes a request for an index block only after it has finished processing the previous request. As a result, a request for an index block not present in any key cache buffer blocks access by other threads while a buffer is being updated to contain the requested index block.

Starting from version 4.1.0, the server supports shared access to the key cache:

Shared access to the key cache allows the server to improve throughput significantly. Multiple Key Caches

Shared access to the key cache improves performance but does not eliminate contention among threads entirely. They still compete for control structures that manage access to the key cache buffers. To reduce key cache access contention further, MySQL 4.1.1 offers the feature of multiple key caches. This allows you to assign different table indexes to different key caches.

When there can be multiple key caches, the server must know which cache to use when processing queries for a given MyISAM table. By default, all MyISAM table indexes are cached in the default key cache. To assign table indexes to a specific key cache, use the CACHE INDEX statement.

For example, the following statement assigns indexes from the tables t1, t2, and t3 to the key cache named hot_cache:

mysql> CACHE INDEX t1, t2, t3 IN hot_cache;
| Table   | Op                 | Msg_type | Msg_text |
| test.t1 | assign_to_keycache | status   | OK       |
| test.t2 | assign_to_keycache | status   | OK       |
| test.t3 | assign_to_keycache | status   | OK       |

Note: If the server has been built with the ISAM storage engine enabled, ISAM tables use the key cache mechanism. However, ISAM indexes use only the default key cache and cannot be reassigned to a different cache.

The key cache referred to in a CACHE INDEX statement can be created by setting its size with a SET GLOBAL parameter setting statement or by using server startup options. For example:

mysql> SET GLOBAL keycache1.key_buffer_size=128*1024;

To destroy a key cache, set its size to zero:

mysql> SET GLOBAL keycache1.key_buffer_size=0;

Key cache variables are structured system variables that have a name and components. For keycache1.key_buffer_size, keycache1 is the cache variable name and key_buffer_size is the cache component. See section 10.4.1 Structured System Variables for a description of the syntax used for referring to structured key cache system variables.

By default, table indexes are assigned to the main (default) key cache created at the server startup. When a key cache is destroyed, all indexes assigned to it are reassigned to the default key cache.

For a busy server, we recommend a strategy that uses three key caches:

One reason the use of three key caches is beneficial is that access to one key cache structure does not block access to the others. Queries that access tables assigned to one cache do not compete with queries that access tables assigned to another cache. Performance gains occur for other reasons as well: Midpoint Insertion Strategy

By default, the key cache management system of MySQL 4.1 uses the LRU strategy for choosing key cache blocks to be evicted, but it also supports a more sophisticated method called the "midpoint insertion strategy."

When using the midpoint insertion strategy, the LRU chain is divided into two parts: a hot sub-chain and a warm sub-chain. The division point between two parts is not fixed, but the key cache management system takes care that the warm part is not ``too short,'' always containing at least key_cache_division_limit percent of the key cache blocks. key_cache_division_limit is a component of structured key cache variables, so its value is a parameter that can be set per cache.

When an index block is read from a table into the key cache, it is placed at the end of the warm sub-chain. After a certain number of hits (accesses of the block), it is promoted to the hot sub-chain. At present, the number of hits required to promote a block (3) is the same for all index blocks. In the future, we will allow the hit count to depend on the B-tree level of the node corresponding to an index block: Fewer hits will be required for promotion of an index block if it contains a non-leaf node from the upper levels of the index B-tree than if it contains a leaf node.

A block promoted into the hot sub-chain is placed at the end of the chain. The block then circulates within this sub-chain. If the block stays at the beginning of the sub-chain for a long enough time, it is demoted to the warm chain. This time is determined by the value of the key_cache_age_threshold component of the key cache.

The threshold value prescribes that, for a key cache containing N blocks, the block at the beginning of the hot sub-chain not accessed within the last N*key_cache_age_threshold/100 hits is to be moved to the beginning of the warm sub-chain. It then becomes the first candidate for eviction, because blocks for replacement always are taken from the beginning of the warm sub-chain.

The midpoint insertion strategy allows you to keep more-valued blocks always in the cache. If you prefer to use the plain LRU strategy, leave the key_cache_division_limit value set to its default of 100.

The midpoint insertion strategy helps to improve performance when execution of a query that requires an index scan effectively pushes out of the cache all the index blocks corresponding to valuable high-level B-tree nodes. To avoid this, you must use a midpoint insertion strategy with the key_cache_division_limit set to much less than 100. Then valuable frequently hit nodes will be preserved in the hot sub-chain during an index scan operation as well. Index Preloading

If there are enough blocks in a key cache to hold blocks of an entire index, or at least the blocks corresponding to its non-leaf nodes, then it makes sense to preload the key cache with index blocks before starting to use it. Preloading allows you to put the table index blocks into a key cache buffer in the most efficient way: by reading the index blocks from disk sequentially.

Without preloading, the blocks still will be placed into the key cache as needed by queries. Although the blocks will stay in the cache, because there are enough buffers for all of them, they will be fetched from disk in a random order, not sequentially.

To preload an index into a cache, use the LOAD INDEX INTO CACHE statement. For example, the following statement preloads nodes (index blocks) of indexes of the tables t1 and t2:

| Table   | Op           | Msg_type | Msg_text |
| test.t1 | preload_keys | status   | OK       |
| test.t2 | preload_keys | status   | OK       |

The IGNORE LEAVES modifier causes only blocks for the non-leaf nodes of the index to be preloaded. Thus, the statement shown preloads all index blocks from t1, but only blocks for the non-leaf nodes from t2.

If an index has been assigned to a key cache using a CACHE INDEX statement, preloading places index blocks into that cache. Otherwise, the index is loaded into the default key cache. Key Cache Block Size

MySQL 4.1 introduces a new key_cache_block_size variable on a per-key cache basis. This variable specifies the size of the block buffers for a key cache. It is intended to allow tuning of the performance of I/O operations for index files.

The best performance for I/O operations is achieved when the size of read buffers is equal to the size of the native operating system I/O buffers. But setting the size of key nodes equal to the size of the I/O buffer does not always ensure the best overall performance. When reading the big leaf nodes, the server pulls in a lot of unnecessary data, effectively preventing reading other leaf nodes.

Currently, you cannot control the size of the index blocks in a table. This size is set by the server when the `.MYI' index file is created, depending on the size of the keys in the indexes present in the table definition. In most cases, it is set equal to the I/O buffer size. In the future, this will be changed and then key_cache_block_size variable will be fully employed. Restructuring a Key Cache

A key cache can be restructured at any time by updating its parameter values. For example:

mysql> SET GLOBAL cold_cache.key_buffer_size=4*1024*1024;

If you assign to either the key_buffer_size or key_cache_block_size key cache component a value that differs from the component's current value, the server destroys the cache's old structure and creates a new one based on the new values. If the cache contains any dirty blocks, the server saves them to disk before destroying and re-creating the cache. Restructuring does not occur if you set other key cache parameters.

When restructuring a key cache, the server first flushes the contents of any dirty buffers to disk. After that, the cache contents become unavailable. However, restructuring does not block queries that need to use indexes assigned to the cache. Instead, the server directly accesses the table indexes using native filesystem caching. Filesystem caching is not as efficient as using a key cache, so although queries will execute, a slowdown can be anticipated. Once the cache has been restructured, it becomes available again for caching indexes assigned to it, and the use of filesystem caching for the indexes ceases.

7.4.7 How MySQL Counts Open Tables

When you execute a mysqladmin status command, you'll see something like this:

Uptime: 426 Running threads: 1 Questions: 11082
Reloads: 1 Open tables: 12

The Open tables value of 12 can be somewhat puzzling if you have only six tables.

MySQL is multi-threaded, so there may be many clients issuing queries for a given table simultaneously. To minimize the problem with multiple client threads having different states on the same table, the table is opened independently by each concurrent thread. This takes some memory but normally increases performance. With MyISAM tables, one extra file descriptor is required for the data file for each client that has the table open. (By contrast, the index file descriptor is shared between all threads.) The ISAM storage engine shares this behavior.

You can read more about this topic in the next section. See section 7.4.8 How MySQL Opens and Closes Tables.

7.4.8 How MySQL Opens and Closes Tables

The table_cache, max_connections, and max_tmp_tables system variables affect the maximum number of files the server keeps open. If you increase one or more of these values, you may run up against a limit imposed by your operating system on the per-process number of open file descriptors. Many operating systems allow you to increase the open-files limit, although the method varies widely from system to system. Consult your operating system documentation to determine whether it is possible to increase the limit and how to do so.

table_cache is related to max_connections. For example, for 200 concurrent running connections, you should have a table cache size of at least 200 * N, where N is the maximum number of tables in a join. You also need to reserve some extra file descriptors for temporary tables and files.

Make sure that your operating system can handle the number of open file descriptors implied by the table_cache setting. If table_cache is set too high, MySQL may run out of file descriptors and refuse connections, fail to perform queries, and be very unreliable. You also have to take into account that the MyISAM storage engine needs two file descriptors for each unique open table. You can increase the number of file descriptors available for MySQL with the --open-files-limit startup option to mysqld_safe. See section A.2.17 File Not Found.

The cache of open tables will be kept at a level of table_cache entries. The default value is 64; this can be changed with the --table_cache option to mysqld. Note that MySQL may temporarily open even more tables to be able to execute queries.

An unused table is closed and removed from the table cache under the following circumstances:

When the table cache fills up, the server uses the following procedure to locate a cache entry to use:

When the cache is in a temporarily extended state and a table goes from a used to unused state, the table is closed and released from the cache.

A table is opened for each concurrent access. This means the table needs to be opened twice if two threads access the same table or if a thread accesses the table twice in the same query (for example, by joining the table to itself). Each concurrent open requires an entry in the table cache. The first open of any table takes two file descriptors: one for the data file and one for the index file. Each additional use of the table takes only one file descriptor, for the data file. The index file descriptor is shared among all threads.

If you are opening a table with the HANDLER tbl_name OPEN statement, a dedicated table object is allocated for the thread. This table object is not shared by other threads and is not closed until the thread calls HANDLER tbl_name CLOSE or the thread terminates. When this happens, the table is put back in the table cache (if the cache isn't full). See section 14.1.3 HANDLER Syntax.

You can determine whether your table cache is too small by checking the mysqld status variable Opened_tables:

mysql> SHOW STATUS LIKE 'Opened_tables';
| Variable_name | Value |
| Opened_tables | 2741  |

If the value is quite big, even when you haven't issued a lot of FLUSH TABLES statements, you should increase your table cache size. See section 5.2.3 Server System Variables and section 5.2.4 Server Status Variables.

7.4.9 Drawbacks to Creating Many Tables in the Same Database

If you have many MyISAM or ISAM tables in a database directory, open, close, and create operations will be slow. If you execute SELECT statements on many different tables, there will be a little overhead when the table cache is full, because for every table that has to be opened, another must be closed. You can reduce this overhead by making the table cache larger.

7.5 Optimizing the MySQL Server

7.5.1 System Factors and Startup Parameter Tuning

We start with system-level factors, because some of these decisions must be made very early to achieve large performance gains. In other cases, a quick look at this section may suffice. However, it is always nice to have a sense of how much can be gained by changing things at this level.

The default operating system to use is very important! To get the best use of multiple-CPU machines, you should use Solaris (because its threads implementation works really well) or Linux (because the 2.2 kernel has really good SMP support). Note that older Linux kernels have a 2GB filesize limit by default. If you have such a kernel and a desperate need for files larger than 2GB, you should get the Large File Support (LFS) patch for the ext2 filesystem. Other filesystems such as ReiserFS and XFS do not have this 2GB limitation.

Before using MySQL in production, we advise you to test it on your intended platform.

Other tips:

7.5.2 Tuning Server Parameters

You can determine the default buffer sizes used by the mysqld server with this command (prior to MySQL 4.1, omit --verbose):

shell> mysqld --verbose --help

This command produces a list of all mysqld options and configurable system variables. The output includes the default variable values and looks something like this:

back_log                 current value: 5
bdb_cache_size           current value: 1048540
binlog_cache_size        current value: 32768
connect_timeout          current value: 5
delayed_insert_limit     current value: 100
delayed_insert_timeout   current value: 300
delayed_queue_size       current value: 1000
flush_time               current value: 0
interactive_timeout      current value: 28800
join_buffer_size         current value: 131072
key_buffer_size          current value: 1048540
long_query_time          current value: 10
lower_case_table_names   current value: 0
max_allowed_packet       current value: 1048576
max_binlog_cache_size    current value: 4294967295
max_connect_errors       current value: 10
max_connections          current value: 100
max_delayed_threads      current value: 20
max_heap_table_size      current value: 16777216
max_join_size            current value: 4294967295
max_sort_length          current value: 1024
max_tmp_tables           current value: 32
max_write_lock_count     current value: 4294967295
myisam_sort_buffer_size  current value: 8388608
net_buffer_length        current value: 16384
net_read_timeout         current value: 30
net_retry_count          current value: 10
net_write_timeout        current value: 60
read_buffer_size         current value: 131072
read_rnd_buffer_size     current value: 262144
slow_launch_time         current value: 2
sort_buffer              current value: 2097116
table_cache              current value: 64
thread_concurrency       current value: 10
thread_stack             current value: 131072
tmp_table_size           current value: 1048576
wait_timeout             current value: 28800

If there is a mysqld server currently running, you can see what values it actually is using for the system variables by connecting to it and issuing this statement:


You can also see some statistical and status indicators for a running server by issuing this statement:


System variable and status information also can be obtained using mysqladmin:

shell> mysqladmin variables
shell> mysqladmin extended-status

You can find a full description for all system and status variables in section 5.2.3 Server System Variables and section 5.2.4 Server Status Variables.

MySQL uses algorithms that are very scalable, so you can usually run with very little memory. However, normally you will get better performance by giving MySQL more memory.

When tuning a MySQL server, the two most important variables to configure are key_buffer_size and table_cache. You should first feel confident that you have these set appropriately before trying to change any other variables.

The following examples indicate some typical variable values for different runtime configurations. The examples use the mysqld_safe script and use --var_name=value syntax to set the variable var_name to the value value. This syntax is available as of MySQL 4.0. For older versions of MySQL, take the following differences into account:

If you have at least 256MB of memory and many tables and want maximum performance with a moderate number of clients, you should use something like this:

shell> mysqld_safe --key_buffer_size=64M --table_cache=256 \
           --sort_buffer_size=4M --read_buffer_size=1M &

If you have only 128MB of memory and only a few tables, but you still do a lot of sorting, you can use something like this:

shell> mysqld_safe --key_buffer_size=16M --sort_buffer_size=1M

If there are very many simultaneous connections, swapping problems may occur unless mysqld has been configured to use very little memory for each connection. mysqld performs better if you have enough memory for all connections.

With little memory and lots of connections, use something like this:

shell> mysqld_safe --key_buffer_size=512K --sort_buffer_size=100K \
           --read_buffer_size=100K &

Or even this:

shell> mysqld_safe --key_buffer_size=512K --sort_buffer_size=16K \
           --table_cache=32 --read_buffer_size=8K \
           --net_buffer_length=1K &

If you are doing GROUP BY or ORDER BY operations on tables that are much larger than your available memory, you should increase the value of read_rnd_buffer_size to speed up the reading of rows after sorting operations.

When you have installed MySQL, the `support-files' directory will contain some different `my.cnf' sample files: `my-huge.cnf', `my-large.cnf', `my-medium.cnf', and `my-small.cnf'. You can use these as a basis for optimizing your system.

Note that if you specify an option on the command line for mysqld or mysqld_safe, it remains in effect only for that invocation of the server. To use the option every time the server runs, put it in an option file.

To see the effects of a parameter change, do something like this (prior to MySQL 4.1, omit --verbose):

shell> mysqld --key_buffer_size=32M --verbose --help

The variable values are listed near the end of the output. Make sure that the --verbose and --help options are last. Otherwise, the effect of any options listed after them on the command line will not be reflected in the output.

For information on tuning the InnoDB storage engine, see section 16.12 InnoDB Performance Tuning Tips.

7.5.3 Controlling Query Optimizer Performance

The task of the query optimizer is to find an optimal plan for executing an SQL query. Because the difference in performance between ``good'' and ``bad'' plans can be orders of magnitude (that is, seconds versus hours or even days), most query optimizers, including that of MySQL, perform more or less exhaustive search for an optimal plan among all possible query evaluation plans. For join queries, the number of possible plans investigated by the MySQL optimizer grows exponentially with the number of tables referenced in a query. For small numbers of tables (typically less than 7-10) this is not a problem. However, when bigger queries are submitted, the time spent in query optimization may easily become the major bottleneck in the server performance.

MySQL 5.0.1 introduces a new more flexible method for query optimization that allows the user to control how exhaustive the optimizer is in its search for an optimal query evaluation plan. The general idea is that the fewer plans that are investigated by the optimizer, the less time it will spend in compiling a query. On the other hand, because the optimizer will skip some plans, it may miss finding an optimal plan.

The behavior of the optimizer with respect to the number of plans it evaluates can be controlled via two system variables:

7.5.4 How Compiling and Linking Affects the Speed of MySQL

Most of the following tests were performed on Linux with the MySQL benchmarks, but they should give some indication for other operating systems and workloads.

You get the fastest executables when you link with -static.

On Linux, you will get the fastest code when compiling with pgcc and -O3. You need about 200MB memory to compile `sql_yacc.cc' with these options, because gcc/pgcc needs a lot of memory to make all functions inline. You should also set CXX=gcc when configuring MySQL to avoid inclusion of the libstdc++ library, which is not needed. Note that with some versions of pgcc, the resulting code will run only on true Pentium processors, even if you use the compiler option indicating that you want the resulting code to work on all x586-type processors (such as AMD).

By just using a better compiler and better compiler options, you can get a 10-30% speed increase in your application. This is particularly important if you compile the MySQL server yourself.

We have tested both the Cygnus CodeFusion and Fujitsu compilers, but when we tested them, neither was sufficiently bug-free to allow MySQL to be compiled with optimizations enabled.

The standard MySQL binary distributions are compiled with support for all character sets. When you compile MySQL yourself, you should include support only for the character sets that you are going to use. This is controlled by the --with-charset option to configure.

Here is a list of some measurements that we have made:

Binary MySQL distributions for Linux that are provided by MySQL AB used to be compiled with pgcc. We had to go back to regular gcc due to a bug in pgcc that would generate code that does not run on AMD. We will continue using gcc until that bug is resolved. In the meantime, if you have a non-AMD machine, you can get a faster binary by compiling with pgcc. The standard MySQL Linux binary is linked statically to make it faster and more portable.

7.5.5 How MySQL Uses Memory

The following list indicates some of the ways that the mysqld server uses memory. Where applicable, the name of the system variable relevant to the memory use is given:

ps and other system status programs may report that mysqld uses a lot of memory. This may be caused by thread stacks on different memory addresses. For example, the Solaris version of ps counts the unused memory between stacks as used memory. You can verify this by checking available swap with swap -s. We have tested mysqld with several memory-leakage detectors (both commercial and open source), so there should be no memory leaks.

7.5.6 How MySQL Uses DNS

When a new client connects to mysqld, mysqld spawns a new thread to handle the request. This thread first checks whether the hostname is in the hostname cache. If not, the thread attempts to resolve the hostname:

You can disable DNS hostname lookups by starting mysqld with the --skip-name-resolve option. However, in this case, you can use only IP numbers in the MySQL grant tables.

If you have a very slow DNS and many hosts, you can get more performance by either disabling DNS lookups with --skip-name-resolve or by increasing the HOST_CACHE_SIZE define (default value: 128) and recompiling mysqld.

You can disable the hostname cache by starting the server with the --skip-host-cache option. To clear the hostname cache, issue a FLUSH HOSTS statement or execute the mysqladmin flush-hosts command.

If you want to disallow TCP/IP connections entirely, start mysqld with the --skip-networking option.

7.6 Disk Issues

7.6.1 Using Symbolic Links

You can move tables and databases from the database directory to other locations and replace them with symbolic links to the new locations. You might want to do this, for example, to move a database to a file system with more free space or increase the speed of your system by spreading your tables to different disk.

The recommended way to do this is to just symlink databases to a different disk. Symlink tables only as a last resort. Using Symbolic Links for Databases on Unix

On Unix, the way to symlink a database is to first create a directory on some disk where you have free space and then create a symlink to it from the MySQL data directory.

shell> mkdir /dr1/databases/test
shell> ln -s /dr1/databases/test /path/to/datadir

MySQL doesn't support linking one directory to multiple databases. Replacing a database directory with a symbolic link will work fine as long as you don't make a symbolic link between databases. Suppose that you have a database db1 under the MySQL data directory, and then make a symlink db2 that points to db1:

shell> cd /path/to/datadir
shell> ln -s db1 db2

Now, for any table tbl_a in db1, there also appears to be a table tbl_a in db2. If one client updates db1.tbl_a and another client updates db2.tbl_a, there will be problems.

If you really need to do this, you can change one of the source files. The file to modify depends on your version of MySQL. For MySQL 4.0 and up, look for the following statement in the `mysys/my_symlink.c' file:

if (!(MyFlags & MY_RESOLVE_LINK) || 
    (!lstat(filename,&stat_buff) && S_ISLNK(stat_buff.st_mode)))

Before MySQL 4.0, look for this statement in the `mysys/mf_format.c' file:

if (flag & 32 || (!lstat(to,&stat_buff) && S_ISLNK(stat_buff.st_mode)))

Change the statement to this:

if (1)

On Windows, you can use internal symbolic links to directories by compiling MySQL with -DUSE_SYMDIR. This allows you to put different databases on different disks. See section Using Symbolic Links for Databases on Windows. Using Symbolic Links for Tables on Unix

Before MySQL 4.0, you should not symlink tables unless you are very careful with them. The problem is that if you run ALTER TABLE, REPAIR TABLE, or OPTIMIZE TABLE on a symlinked table, the symlinks will be removed and replaced by the original files. This happens because these statements work by creating a temporary file in the database directory and replacing the original file with the temporary file when the statement operation is complete.

You should not symlink tables on systems that don't have a fully working realpath() call. (At least Linux and Solaris support realpath()). You can check whether your system supports symbolic links by issuing a SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'have_symlink' statement.

In MySQL 4.0, symlinks are fully supported only for MyISAM tables. For other table types, you will probably get strange problems if you try to use symbolic links on files in the operating system with any of the preceding statements.

The handling of symbolic links for MyISAM tables in MySQL 4.0 works the following way:

SHOW CREATE TABLE doesn't report if a table has symbolic links prior to MySQL 4.0.15. This is also true for mysqldump, which uses SHOW CREATE TABLE to generate CREATE TABLE statements.

Table symlink operations that are not yet supported: Using Symbolic Links for Databases on Windows

Beginning with MySQL 3.23.16, the mysqld-max and mysql-max-nt servers for Windows are compiled with the -DUSE_SYMDIR option. This allows you to put a database directory on a different disk by setting up a symbolic link to it. This is similar to the way that symbolic links work on Unix, although the procedure for setting up the link is different.

As of MySQL 4.0, symbolic links are enabled by default. If you don't need them, you can disable them with the skip-symbolic-links option:


Before MySQL 4.0, symbolic links are disabled by default. To enable them, you should put the following entry in your `my.cnf' or `my.ini' file:


On Windows, you make a symbolic link to a MySQL database by creating a file in the data directory that contains the path to the destination directory. The file should be named `db_name.sym', where db_name is the database name.

Suppose that the MySQL data directory is `C:\mysql\data' and you want to have database foo located at `D:\data\foo'. Set up a symlink like this:

  1. Make sure that the `D:\data\foo' directory exists by creating it if necessary. If you already have a database directory named `foo' in the data directory, you should move it to `D:\data'. Otherwise, the symbolic link will be ineffective. To avoid problems, the server should not be running when you move the database directory.
  2. Create a file `C:\mysql\data\foo.sym' that contains the pathname D:\data\foo\.

After that, all tables created in the database foo will be created in `D:\data\foo'. Note that the symbolic link will not be used if a directory with the database name exists in the MySQL data directory.

Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.